Bernhard Wälchli
Stockholm University
Logophoricity in Eastern Vidzeme: The Literary Latvian idiolect of Andrievs
Niedra and Leivu Estonian
Eastern Vidzeme is an important, hitherto neglected, area for the study of
logophoricity in the Circum-Baltic languages. This paper shows, on the one
hand, that logophoricity in Latvian is not restricted to Latgalian dialects,
but is almost fully consistent in the writings of the novelist Andrievs Niedra
(1871–1942) originating from Tirza, and on the other hand, that Leivu Estonian,
a moribund South Estonian language island in Northeastern Vidzeme between
Gulbene and Alūksne, is the only Estonian variety having developed a
logophoric pronoun.
Given the high diversity of logophoricity in Latvian, it is important to
study idiolects with large corpora, and written language deserves more study.
Like Finnish dialects and Leivu Estonian, Niedra’s idiolect uses logophoric
pronouns even for marking the report addressee in questions. Unlike in the
Latgalian tales discussed by Nau (2006), logophoricity can be extended beyond
the domain of report to thought. A distinction between allophoric (frame and
report speaker are different) and autophoric reports (frame and report speaker
are the same) is introduced. It is argued that logophoric pronouns are a
non-deictic and noncoreference-based strategy to mark reports, that their
function is not primarily reference tracking, and that logophoric pronouns in
Latvian are constructionalized rather than grammaticalized.
Keywords: logophoricity, Latvian, Leivu Estonian, pronouns, speech act
participants, evidential, constructions, reference tracking, logophoric middle,
Andrievs Niedra